Kenilworth Kibitzer

A blog for members of the Kenilworth Chess Club.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

 

Tears of a Clown

#18  Reshevsky-Geller  (click here to view on chessgames.com)

Before there was Fischer, there was Reshevsky, the first American to threaten the Soviet machine.  The 1953 Candidates tournament was as close as he came to a world championship match, and indeed how close he came.  This game was as important as Keres-Smyslov in determining the final standings.  An endgame approached, and Reshevsky had every reason for optimism...

31. b6   Rb8?

Bronstein gives the amazing 31. ... Rxa3!  32. b7  Rb4  33. Rd8+   Kh7  34. b8=Q  Rxb8  35. Rxb8  Rd3  36. Rf1  Rc3!  with a likely drawn 4v3 rook endgame.  Tragically easy for us humans to miss...
Analysis diagram after 36. .... Rc3!

















Instead the game heads down more prosaic channels...for now.

32. Rd6  Ra4
33. Rxc2  Rxa3
34. h3    Rb3
35. Rcc6  Rb2
36. e4      h5
37. e5      h4
38. Rd4?!   

Bronstein: And here it might seem that nothing can save Black.  Nevertheless, I would not have traded my b-pawn for the insignificant h-pawn.  Couldn't White have relocated his rook along the seventh rank?  
Bronstein gives 38. e6  f6  39. Rc7! Rxb6  40. R6d7 as winning, as indeed it is.

38. ....     R2xb6
39. Rxb6  Rxb6
40. Rxh4  Rb1+
41. Kh2    Re1

Averbakh:  Reshevsky did not conceal his surprise that Geller decided to play on. With an ironic smile he sat down at the board, ordered a cup of coffee and began slowly stirring it with his spoon. There was indeed no reason to hurry: the two extra pawns were a sure guarantee of victory.

Bronstein: In order to understand what follows, keep in mind that there are some rook endings in which two extra pawns are not enough to win...sometimes it is impossible to win the ending with rook and f- and h-pawns against rook, or rook and two connected passed pawns against rook, if the pawns can be blockaded.  Geller is hoping to transpose into one of these endgames.  

What follows is a series of suboptimal moves, each of which is individually insignificant but which lead collectively to a truly poor move.

42. f4      Re3
43. Rg4  Kh7
44. Rg3   Re2
45. h4     Re4
46. Rf3   f6
47. exf6  gxf6
48. Kg3?!  Kg6     (48. g4!)
49. Ra3  f5
50. Ra6+ Kh5

51. Rf6??   Re3+       (51.  Ra8 is still sufficient to win)
52. Kf2   Ra3        (Now the problem with Rf6 - stalemate is in the air!)
53. g3    Rf3+!!         (See below for analysis of 53. Rxg5+)

Averbakh: It can be imagined with what pleasure Geller made this move, and how triumphantly he looked at his opponent. And Reshevsky? In the seconds remaining to the time control he began thinking intensively. At that moment Geller summoned a waiter, deliberately loudly ordered a glass of tea, and the unhurriedly began stirring in some sugar.

54. Ke2  Rxg3
55. Rxf5+ Kxh4
56. Kf2    Ra3
57. Rg5   Rb3
58. Rg1  Kh5
59. Ke2  Ra3
60. f5     Ra5

1/2-1/2    
A tragedy for Reshevsky....but what about the simple 53. Rxg5+  Kxh4, going into a 2v0 rook endgame?
But this too is drawn!  An unusual case, but with White's king cut off below the third rank, his pawns cannot advance unchallenged.   If the f-pawn advances the Black king chases it, and the combination of king and rook will blockade the g-pawn.   An unusual draw, requiring key conditions - connected pawns with the black king in front, an active Black rook and a mostly inactive White rook (in its worst position in front).    

Try this against Fritz - it's oddly frustrating.





Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]



Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home

Archives

February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   May 2012   July 2012   December 2012   January 2013   February 2013   July 2013   October 2013   March 2014  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]