Kenilworth Kibitzer

A blog for members of the Kenilworth Chess Club.

Saturday, October 31, 2009


Playing That Special Someone, Part 2

Continuing our endgame analysis of my recent game against my personal kryptonite (and no, Joe, I won't reveal who it is because uttering their name summons them like a dark spirit)...

Here it's White to play, and as noted below White faces a grim defense, being one pawn down and having isolated doubled pawns.  I would go so far as to say that if the rooks are taken off the board, White is lost.  White must keep and activate at least one rook, trying to create (in combination with the bishop) weaknesses in Black's queenside pawns.  In White's favor is Black's kingside pawn structure, which is wretched - if the black king drifts from the kingside then a White rook can bring serious pressure from the g-file.   Or White can try to exchange kingside pawns and perhaps open up space for a rook to penetrate.

20. Rab1  Nc5    The knight takes up its perfect outpost
21. Rf4?!   Re8    Black sets up to dominate the e-file, whereas White begins to drift without a plan
22. Bc4+  Kf8
23. Rf3?!  Re7
24. Rh3    Rae8   White has wasted 3 of the last 4 moves with 'mysterious' rook maneuvers, though to be honest I think this position is almost lost at any rate.  I think White may have been planning to break up the Black pawns with a g-pawn sacrifice, but this plan is too slow if also dubious.

25. Rf1  Re4
26. Bd5  R4e5
27. Bb3  NxB?    A mistake of overcaution - I didn't like the way the Bishop controlled the vulnerable light squares of Black's K-side, but those square are empty and unneeded.  Better is 27....a5 starting the Q-side pawns rolling and gaining tempo on the immobile bishop.  I thought the Rook endgame was simply won for Black, and while it is won it is not entirely simple.
28. cxN  Re2
29. Rf2  Re1+
30. Rf1   R8c2?!       The priniciple of two weaknesses is handy to remember - a single weakness is defensible in the right circumstance, but two weaknesses are almost impossible to defend against a vigorous attack.  White's weaknesses are 1) A 1-pawn deficit, 2) Backwards Q-side pawns.  My last move was meant to provoke a rook exchange but White does not need to oblige and can take steps toward resolving their second weakness with 31. a4!  Better for black was 30...b5!  fixing White's weakness and developing a passed pawn.

31. RxR?  RxR+    Missing 31. a4, and now the endgame is again lost.  Always look for the second resource!
32. Kf2   Ra1
33. a4     Ra2+!   
34. Kf1    a6??       Black now needs to capitalize on the progress that has been made.  I wanted to play ....a6, ...b5 and ...bxa4, but at any time White can prevent this plan, most easily with 35. c4 and it is not clear how Black can improve his position.  With  Black's king stuck on the K-side because of the weak g-pawn, White has real chances to draw.  The correct plan, which I saw but misevaluated, is to play 34....d5 35. Rd3 c6 36. c4 dxc4  where I feared the penetration of White's rook onto the 7th and a pawn massacre.  A closer look reveals of course that this position is winning for Black but I did not look deeply enough and chose a 'safer' continuation, one which should safely draw as it turns out.
35. Re3 (c4!)  b5?  (d5 can still be played)
36. Re4?  Rc2!     White's last chance was the simple axb when the 3 vs 2 pawn structure on the Q-side may yet be good enough for a draw with best play.  Now the loss can be forced.

37. Re3?!  PxP
38. PxP    Kf7?!   A delay, on the next move I find a winning rook maneuver
39. h3      Rd2!    The rook will go to c5 where White can no longer defend all their pawns, and with a two pawn deficit the game cannot be saved.
40. Kg1   Rd5
41. Rf3    Rc5     

On the next move Rc4 will win either the a-pawn or c-pawn, all can't be defended.  The game continued to the 56th move as my opponent played for a trap - What should Black really not do in this position?  Fortunately I wasn't inebriated at this point.  


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home


February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   May 2012   July 2012   December 2012   January 2013   February 2013   July 2013   October 2013   March 2014  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]