Kenilworth Kibitzer

A blog for members of the Kenilworth Chess Club.

Friday, March 27, 2009


And now for something completely different

As opposed to the usual tactical shot, a question of evaluation from Don Carrelli:
In the following position with Black to move, what should be the outcome of the game?  My opinion in the comments...


Hillside Chess Club Seeks

The Director at the Hillside Public Library is in search of a volunteer chess instructor or club manager to offer a chess program this summer. She writes: "Due to limited funds, we are looking for a volunteer, but the schedule could be as often or as infrequent as necessary and we can schedule evenings as well. I can offer you some very interested, responsive kids and great appreciation from the community!" If you are interested in helping out, contact:

Miriam Bein, Director
Hillside Public Library
Liberty & Hillside Avenues
Hillside NJ 07205
voice 973-923-4413 x408
fax 973-923-0506


Wednesday, March 25, 2009


Like a bolt from an azure sky

Black stands to lose a piece, is there a way to rescue the game?  (In the actual game from 1906, Black resigned here).

Saturday, March 21, 2009


Personal Favorite

From time to time (and with some help from your opponent) you have a game that confirms your Kasparovian genius, and proves that if you just had a little more time to study then you could be a grandmaster too.  In this recent game, I was inspired by the famous Morphy opera box consultation game to do the first exchange sacrifice I've ever (intentionally) done, and to do it without bothering to calculate the outcome.  

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 d5?!  (I think this is unsound, but this was a G/45 and any surprise no matter how unsound can prove unpleasant)

4. exd5 Qxd5 (I was trying hard to figure out what traps might be hidden in this opening) 5. Nc3 Qe6+ 6. Be3 PxP 7. NxP NxN 8. QxN Nf6?! +/- (It could be 8...Bd7 already needed to be played.  There have been no tricks in this opening, just Black wasting some time in development.  He is not close to castling.)

9. O-O-O (Simple and probably best) Qd6? (Looking to exchange queens but really just inviting disaster on the d-file) 10. Qa4+ Bd7 11. Bb5 Qc7 (At first I thought 11...BxB 12. QxB+ Qc6 keeps things together, but better is 12. NxB! Qc6 13. Nc7#) 
12. RxB!  NxR +- (This sort of combination isn't my style, but I didn't hesitate to sacrifice the rook with every one of my pieces bearing down on the Black king) 13. Rd1 Rd8 14. Nd5 (another piece enters battle) Qc8 15. Bxa7!

Black is up the exchange but everything else is grim beyond imagining.  The rook is trapped, the knight pinned and the queen useless.  And with the king hemmed in by his pieces, there's even the possibility of a 1-move knight checkmate.

15...e6 16. Nb6 Qc7 17. NxN Bd6 (Anything wins for White by this point) 18. Bb6 Bf4+ 

(Or does it??  Does 19. Kb1 Qxc3 20. Nxc3 Rxd1# win for Black?  Sadly, no - Nxc3 comes with discovered check)  19. Kb1 RxN 20. BxR+ 1-0

Friday, March 13, 2009


Endgame miniature

In the following position, after ...Qxa7, can White force a win?

Tuesday, March 10, 2009


USCF rated quad at Kenilworth

Starts Thursday night, G/60 lasting 3 weeks.  See John Moldovan's excellent Chess Coroner blog for all the info.  It's a rated tournament, so that means that four-digit representation of your worth as a person will be at risk.  But the journey of a thousand miles (to Grandmaster) must start with the first step.

Sunday, March 8, 2009


How not to play, a lesson in 25 moves

I enjoy playing the White side of the Maroczy bind, very quickly one gets an advantage in space that feels very comforting.  However, there is a risk in getting too comfortable, and in this game this is what I did.  My opponent played a relatively flawless game, taking advantage at all times of my inability to generate a useful attack, so I find this instructive:

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Bg7 5. Be3 (c4!?) Nc6 6. c4 Nf6 7. Nc3 O-O 8. Be2 d6 9. O-O Bd7 10. Rc1 NxN 11. BxN Bc6

Typical play in this Maroczy against the Accelerated Dragon, nothing new here.

12. f3 Nd7

the f3 push is by no means unusual and in fact is the most popular move at this point.  However, the stage is already set for a strong knight versus weak bishop scenario as occurs in the game.  A reasonable alternative is 12. Qd3.

13. BxB (b4!? is stronger, also possible is Be3 to maintain pieces) KxB 14. Kh1 ?!  

Here I was searching for a plan, and I couldn't see a reason for the 'patzer check' Qd4+.  But this keeps the black queen off b6 and centralizes my queen, this was the first bad decision.

14...Qb6! (of course!) 15. b3? (another mistake - why weaken the pawn chain and create a target?  15. Qd2 or 15. Rc2, preparing action on Black's weakened e-file or kingside are preferable.  Events now start to swing in Black's favor).  15...a5!? 16. Nd5 BxN 17. exN!?

The right decision, there are still chances on the kingside, but White has to move quickly.

17...Kg8 18. f4 Nc5 (good knight, bad bishop) 19. Qd4 a4 20. Rb1?  (a poor decision - the b-pawn could have been defended via Rc3, and it is then also available to attack on the kingside.  Now the position is still in balance, but Black has the initiative) 20...PxP 21. PxP Qb4 22. Rf3 

Finally on move 22 there is a sign of aggression.  But is it too late?

22...Ra2 23. Bf1? (Re3!  Counterplay!)  Rfa8 24. Re3 (now this may be too late.  23. f5 might have caused more problems for Black) 23...Rd2  25. Bd3?? (Somehow I missed Qc3 was perfectly acceptable) Qxb3!  (ouch)  ---+

Monday, March 2, 2009


Least Motion Principle

The least motion principle is the Occam's razor of chemistry - basically, the less that atoms have to move in space for a chemical reaction to occur, the more likely that reaction is to happen.  I found myself wondering if the same idea can apply to positional play in chess...the less you have to move your pieces for a given task, the more likely you are to succeed.  Economy of movement is key to attacking chess, but also to positional maneuvering.  Sometimes the weakest response to a threat against a piece or pawn is to move it away from the threat, rather than supporting the piece or even ignoring the threat with a counter threat!  
A simple example can be seen below, in 'Parsippany Fight Club Part 2' where ...Nf5! ignores the threat of losing the exchange while threatening mate and the win of a rook.  Or there is the otherworldly example (position above) from game 4 of the Kasparov-Karpov 1990 world championship match, where the Greatest of All Time leaves his rook on e6 hanging for the next eight moves!  
On the other hand there are times when needlessly weakening moves are made in response to perceived threats, and it was a series of those I played in an insipid game where I lost on the white side of the Maroczy Bind.   We'll look at this game later this week. 


February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   May 2012   July 2012   December 2012   January 2013   February 2013   July 2013   October 2013   March 2014  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]